Groups are raising red flags about proposed changes to how civics are taught in Florida schools, saying they say could remove critical thinking and add bias.

TAMPA, Fla. — This story is the latest installment in our YouTube series, “What’s Brewing,” investigative reporter Jenna Bourne’s series of homemade deep dives into important issues during the coronavirus pandemic. Click here to check out the series and subscribe to our YouTube channel: The Deeper Dive. 

Some educators are raising red flags about proposed changes to how civics are taught in Florida schools, saying they say could remove critical thinking and add bias.

If the current draft of revised civics standards gets approved by the Florida Board of Education as-is, students would no longer learn the differences between America’s political parties, how to evaluate candidates, or conduct a mock election. 

Evie Worsley, who just finished her first civics class in 7th grade this past school year at Bartow Middle in Polk County, said it’s easy to see the importance of learning how our government works. 

“It helps you give a say in how the country is ran,” the 12-year-old told 10 Investigates. 

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has been vocal about his administration’s efforts to expand civics education for students like Evie.  

He signed this bill into law in 2019 instructing the Florida Department of Education to review the state’s civics standards. 

In the new proposed standards the department came up with this year, most of the changes raising eyebrows among educators happened in 7th grade, so we’re going to focus our attention there. 

“I’ll understand more whenever I’m voting, what the Democrats and Republicans are, who they are,” said Evie. 

Not necessarily. In the current draft of revised civics standards, students like Evie won’t learn that anymore. 

The current standard requiring that 7th graders learn to “Identify America’s current political parties, and illustrate their ideas about government” would be eliminated. 

10 Investigates wanted to ask the Florida Department of Education’s K-12 Chancellor Jacob Oliva about that, so we showed up to a Standards Listening Tour stop in Kissimmee last week. 

“Isn’t that fundamental to understanding American politics?” 10 Investigates reporter Jenna Bourne asked Oliva. 

“So, when we look at the different standards that are put out for draft review, it’s important to remember that they’re not finalized. So, if a standard is in consideration to be eliminated, it may not just be eliminated from 7th grade. It may be being moved to 6th grade. It may be moved to 8th grade,” said Oliva. 

“I did check to see if that standard was just moved to a different grade, and it wasn’t. It’s just been eliminated,” said Jenna. 

“OK, that’s feedback we’d be happy to take to our work groups,” said Oliva. 

Another standard that would get cut, if the current draft of civics standards gets approved: 7th graders would not learn to “evaluate candidates for political office by analyzing their qualifications, experience, issue-based platforms, debates, and political ads” anymore.  

Instead, they would only learn to “identify the constitutional qualifications required to hold federal and state office.” 

And 7th graders wouldn’t “conduct a mock election to demonstrate the voting process and its impact on a school, community, or local level” anymore. 

That standard would be replaced with one requiring them to “compare the election and voting process at the community, local, state and federal levels.” 

Cathryn Goble-Smith, a social studies curriculum specialist at Polk County Public Schools, said the hands-on experience of a mock election sticks with students for years. 

“We live in a hotly tested political climate right now. People are on edge about a lot of things. So, I can understand not wanting to use actual candidates that are running for president, or governor, or something like that. But I think for students to get the experience of conducting a mock election is still an important one – even if we use a Candidate A and a Candidate B, or even if we use it with people in our school in our student councils or student governments,” Goble-Smith told 10 Investigates. 

During the June 3 Standards Listening Tour in Kissimmee, Goble-Smith told Chancellor Oliva she’s concerned the proposed changes decrease critical thinking and add bias. 

“There is some issue with the objectivity of some of the standards. They give students foregone conclusions,” said Goble-Smith. 

Some of the proposed standards shift from teaching students to compare different governing strategies to teaching that the American way is the best way. 

So, instead of the current standard of learning to “compare different forms of government,” 7th graders would be taught to “analyze the advantages of the United States constitutional republic to other forms of government in safeguarding liberty, freedom and a representative government.”  

Instead of learning to “compare parliamentary, federal, confederal, and unitary systems of government,” 7th graders would have to “explain the advantages of a federal system of government over other systems in balancing local sovereignty with national unity and protecting against authoritarianism.” 

The new proposed standards would also add a new benchmark requiring 7th graders to “explain the advantages of capitalism and a free market system over government controlled economic systems (e.g. socialism and communism) in generating economic prosperity for all citizens.” 

Another brand-new benchmark would require 7th grade students to “explain why the Electoral College is essential to the United States’ constitutional republic.” 

“I don’t think they should tell us what to think. I think they should tell us the information and give us the chance to think what we want to think,” said Evie. 

“Any good teacher would tell you that part of our job is to play devil’s advocate and to have students look at both sides of any issue. So, any social studies teacher would say, what are the advantages and what are the disadvantages?” said Goble-Smith. 

In an April 9 workshop for teachers, curriculum specialists and other stakeholders, some commenters expressed concerns about “nationalism” and bias in the proposed standards. 

One commenter said, “It is our job as educators to teach children how to think, not what to think.” 

And several people questioned who wrote the new standards. 

“Who created the revisions to Civics standards? If it was an expert panel, what are the names of the individuals or organizations on the panel?” asked one commenter. 

10 Investigates started asking the Florida Department of Education’s communications office that same question back in April. 

After two months of asking and no names, we asked Chancellor Oliva in-person after the Standards Listening Tour event in Kissimmee wrapped up. 

“It’s reflective of teachers across the state of Florida. So, we have elementary, middle and high school teachers from all over the state,” said Oliva. “And we also ask some national stakeholders to review their work.” 

“Is there anywhere the public can find the names of these people who are on these expert work groups?” asked Jenna. 

“If it’s not on our website, we’d be happy to add this to our website. It’s not a secret,” said Oliva, “This is the first I’ve ever been asked. So, we’d be happy to follow up with you.”  

10 Investigates got the list of names from the Florida Department of Education the next day. 

They’re teachers and curriculum experts from around Florida, plus someone the department identifies as a “charter school rep.” 

10 Investigates has not been able to track down any details about that charter school representative and the Department of Education has not yet responded to our request for more information about her. 

But who are the “national stakeholders” that, according to Oliva, review the expert group’s work? 

The Bill of Rights Institute is based in Virginia and tax records show it receives funding from the Koch family, known for supporting libertarian and conservative causes. 

The institute did not respond to 10 Investigates’ questions, but its website says it “does not take partisan positions.” 

Hillsdale College is a private Christian school in Michigan. 

It has ties to former President Donald Trump’s former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, according to The Washington PostPolitico, and The Guardian. 

It also receives funding from the Charles Koch Foundation. 

A Hillsdale College spokesperson replied to 10 Investigates’ questions with its own questions about how we intended to characterize its ties to DeVos and the Charles Koch Foundation.  

She did not answer any of the questions we sent.  

The Florida Center for Joint Citizenship is a partnership between the The Lou Frey Institute at the University of Central Florida and the Bob Graham Center at the University of Florida.  

“We are strictly non-partisan and we work hard to ensure that we maintain that stance,” Dr. Stephen Masyada, who directs the Florida Joint Center for Citizenship and The Lou Frey Institute, told 10 Investigates in an email. “Currently, we are represented on the committee tasked with suggesting revisions to the state benchmarks, along with a number of teachers and district supervisors. Our role is to provide feedback and suggestions; we have no say on the final product.” 

Both UF and UCF also get funding from the Charles Koch Foundation. 

Oliva said the Department of Education will take feedback from the public into consideration and post the final version of its proposed new civics standards here by the end of June. 

They’ll present the final version to the State Board of Education for approval in July.

More from What’s Brewing:

►Breaking news and weather alerts: Get the free 10 Tampa Bay app