This week’s five-hour sojourn by Deputy President William Ruto at the Wilson Airport culminating in his being refused to fly out to Uganda made me reflect on how the Kenyatta Two succession is eerily very similar to the Kenyatta A single succession a lot more than 4 decades in the past.
Both of those Kenyattas had been headed to an imminent and unalterable departure from Condition Dwelling, Kenyatta 1 by dint of outdated age and failing well being and Kenyatta Two by the Structure.
Kenyatta One’s constitutional successor was Daniel Arap Moi, a Kalenjin much like Kenyatta Two’s William Ruto, also Kalenjin. The two have been avowed loyalists of their respective Kenyattas while in the circumstance of DP Ruto, the loyalty, even though pronounced fervently by the DP, has currently been questioned by Kenyatta Two supporters.
In 1976 when it appeared that Kenyatta One’s departure was imminent, the cabal about him devised a process of eradicating him from pure succession by initiating a transform to the Constitution. This failed politically when Kenyatta Just one, with Lawyer Basic Charles Njonjo’s aid, refused to lend help. Njonjo killed debate on the issue when he famously decreed that it was treason “to envision, assume or encompass the demise of the President”.
In 2021, BBI is proposing to change the Structure. When the present Constitution, unlike the 1978 just one does not grant Ruto automatic succession, the political assure “kumi yangu na kumi yake” appeared like an computerized handover.
That was till the “handshake” involving Kenyatta Two and Raila Odinga whose natural outcome was to introduce a new suitor to the succession arrangement. The handshake and its little one, the BBI, significantly like the 1976 adjust of the Constitution would complicate Ruto’s accession to the throne.
Apparently sufficient, DP Ruto’s most voluble supporters, a lot like the Njonjos and GG Kariukis of 1976 are Kikuyus. The similarities do not finish there. Between 1974 and 1978 when Kenyatta Just one died, VP Moi was subjected to incessant humiliations like remaining stored waiting around at Condition House for hrs and getting blocked and searched at roadblocks in particular in Nakuru, courtesy of then Rift Valley Provincial Commissioner Isaiya Mathenge and law enforcement boss James Mungai, he of the “Ngoroko” fame.
Kenyatta A single appeared to both not be privy to the humiliations or just unconcerned. This weeks’ Wilson Airport incident is uncannily very similar to VP Moi’s tribulations. There are, having said that, significant variations in the two successions. In Moi’s situation, Kenyatta One particular refused to guidance the Transform the Constitution team. Kenyatta Two is in aid of the handshake and BBI.
But the most considerable big difference is the reaction of the respective deputies. Moi took the quest to sideline him stoically, rather using his political contacts including Njonjo, as the fronts for the battle. Their loyalty to Moi was publicly unfamiliar right until he arrived to electric power.
He endured humiliations without the need of a squeak, both about his tormentors or their principal. Without a doubt, most Kenyans knew of these functions from Moi’s biographers generally Andrew Morton. DP Ruto on the other hand, has taken the combat to his opponents in just the President’s circle with vigour. He has referred to as out his humiliators on radio and Television reveals. His political supporters are on a regular basis paraded as an pretty much different authorities in Karen. He throws broadsides at his manager, this week suggesting the Jubilee government unsuccessful mainly because he was “evicted”, leaving listeners to interpret what that suggests of his boss’s ability.
Of program Moi went on to come to be President and to serve the revenge dish sizzling to his tormentors. Whether or not DP Ruto will similarly have the last laugh, we can only wait and see.
But if I was his counsel, I would suggest that though history does not provide a template, it has practical lessons which he would be sensible to extract some rules.